Federal Security Controls on Scientific and Technical Information

"'Sensitive But Unclassified' and Other Federal Security Controls on Scientific and Technical Information: History and Current Controversy"
by Knezo, Genevieve J.
Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service,

http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31845.pdf
(2 April 2003)

The U.S. Government has always maintained a level of security over the release of scientific and technical information that is deemed vital to national interests. The events of 9/11 have added to and broadened existing controls governing access of this type of information. The challenge to policy makers is how to balance the free flow of scientific information with the needs of national security. Ms. Knezo has produced a well research and well documented (There are 163 footnote references) report that examines the background of these safeguard measures. She also explores several key policy issues pertaining the the release of data. The report is organized into four major sections. The report begins with a review and summary of significant pieces of legislation, including patent law, the Atomic energy Act, the USA Patriot Act, etc. Secondly the author examines the various definitions of 'Sensitive But Unclassified' (SBU), and how this term has evolved for use by various governmental and military organizations. The third and fourth sections of the report cover controversies and policy options respectively. The policy options seek to develop a coherent, consistent and balanced definition of the SBU classification, and its application to the publication of scientific and technical information, emanating from both governmental and private sectors. All this shielded by controls designed to prevent sensitive data from getting into the hands of terrorists. A good read for those seeking background information, and current status in understanding how information is to be protected.

Reported in Current Cites

Posted by Tom on September 30, 2003